Medical negligence: Only 33 doctors proven guilty in Karnataka since 2012
The Karnataka Medical Council (KMC) registered 329 cases against doctors from districts across the state between 2012 and 2017.
Furnishing data sought by TOI, KMC officials said that compared to other districts, awareness about KMC and healthcare complications is more in Bengaluru, because of which most cases have been registered in the city (200) in the said period.
However, KMC can only issue a warning to a doctor proven guilty and remove him/her from its register for over six months. "The powers vested with KMC are limited. For any financial compensation from the hospital or doctor, in an alleged case of medical negligence, a patient has to go to the consumer court. If proven guilty, we send a warning notice to the concerned doctor and suspend his/her registration for six months to one year. The district health officer is directed to make sure the guilty doctor isn't allowed to practise medicine during the period the registration is withdrawn by the KMC," said KMC president Dr H Veerabhadrappa.
According to the data available, the highest number of complaints (79) was registered in 2014, of which 52 were from Bengaluru alone. In one of the cases registered in 2014, the complainant alleged that he lost his eyesight after a city-based ophthalmologist made him undergo gene therapy with an assurance that he'd have clear vision soon after.
In many cases, financial constraints and dejection following medical complications make complainant stay away from KMC hearings. However, engaging an advocate to fight a case at KMC isn't mandatory, said Veerabhadrappa.
In most cases, the doctors remain safe, as it isn't easy to prove them guilty, as long as they'd have followed the standard protocol. "In most cases, it's more of a perception of negligence than negligence itself. Standard of proof in a criminal case against a doctor is very high. It's no easy to prove an allegation of negligence on the part of a doctor, as long as the doctor has followed the standard treatment protocol. But cases of gross errors, like a doctor operating on the brain instead of heart, hold," said Dhyan Chinnappa, a senior advocate with the Karnataka High Court, who has dealt with such medico-legal cases. However, this shouldn't stop a genuinely affected patient from registering complaint with the KMC, consumer court and police, he added.
COMMENTS
All Comments
By commenting, you agree to the Prohibited Content Policy
PostBy commenting, you agree to the Prohibited Content Policy
PostFind this Comment Offensive?
Choose your reason below and click on the submit button. This will alert our moderators to take actions