64-year-old cancer patient wants to skip surgery
Ever since he heard about the Supreme Court verdict on ‘living will’, 64-year-old Yajul Haq has been pleading with doctors to ‘let him go’.

Ever since he heard about the Supreme Court verdict on ‘living will’, 64-year-old Yajul Haq has been pleading with doctors to ‘let him go’.
What forced Justice A K Sikri, part of the five-judge bench led by CJI Dipak Misra, to dwell on economics while favouring passive euthanasia was the spiralling daily expense in hospitals to keep a terminally ill person on life support system, often spelling financial ruin for poor families.
The ruling stems from a petition filed by an NGO 'Common Cause', who had approached the court seeking a direction for recognition of 'living will'.
The petitioner, NGO 'Common Cause', had approached the court seeking a direction for recognition of 'living will' and contended that when a medical expert said that a person afflicted with terminal disease had reached a point of no return, then she should be given the right to refuse being put on life support.
The apex court declined to give any direction on the issue and said it was for the government to take a call, as it asked a group of four persons, including a Mumbai-based lawyer and three senior doctors to make a representation in this regard.