ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

More in ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

  • Live-in relations are infatuation, lack sincerity: Allahabad high court

    The Allahabad High Court in India has dismissed a plea by an interfaith live-in couple seeking police protection, stating that such relationships are often driven by infatuation and result in temporary and fragile arrangements. While acknowledging that the Supreme Court has validated live-in relationships in the past, the division bench of Justices Rahul Chaturvedi and Mohammad Azhar Husain Idrisi emphasized that unless the couple decides to marry and commit to a serious relationship, the court will not express an opinion on such arrangements. The case involved a petition filed by a Hindu-Muslim couple challenging an FIR lodged against the man by the woman's aunt.

    live in relations are infatuation lack sincerity allahabad high court
  • Homeopathic docs to retire at 62 years: Allahabad HC

    A bench of the Lucknow High Court has determined that the retirement age for government homeopathic doctors is 60 years, but the retirement age for government allopathic doctors is 62 years. This violates the principle of equality. A bench of justice Vivek Chaudhary passed the order on the plea of Dr Yadav. It was pleaded on his behalf that in 2017 the retirement age of allopathic doctors of provincial services was increased to 62 years, but it was not increased for homeopathic doctors which was discrimination.

    homeopathic docs to retire at 62 years allahabad hc
  • Allahabad HC seeks plan for seasonal diseases

    The court was especially concerned about the alleged lack of beds in government hospitals for such patients. It also pulled up the municipal corporation for its failure to control the spread of dengue due to poor sanitation arrangement and fogging.

    allahabad hc seeks plan for seasonal diseases
  • Does the SC divide over the judiciary's role in Covid management?

    Hearing a plea filed by Uttar Pradesh government against the Allahabad High Court which had passed a slew of directions on management of the pandemic in the state and passed adverse observations against the government, a bench of Justices Vineet Saran and Dinesh Maheshwari asked whether the HC should have entered the arena.

    does the sc divide over the judiciary s role in covid management
Advertisement